1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MORGAN v. HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
 

MORGAN v. HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

No. 3:16-CV-00544-K-BF.

FRANKIE N. MORGAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division.

February 15, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 446 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frankie N Morgan, Plaintiff, represented by Brook Eben Miscoski , Hurr Law Office PC.

Angela Morgan-Lyles, Plaintiff, represented by Brook Eben Miscoski , Hurr Law Office PC.

Harmony Public Schools, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP, Adam David Courtin , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP, Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Richard B. Roper, III , Thompson & Knight LLP.

Harmony School of Nature and Athletics, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP, Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Richard B. Roper, III , Thompson & Knight LLP.

Harmony School of Nature Independent School, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP, Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Richard B. Roper, III , Thompson & Knight LLP.

Mehmet Basoglu, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

Bilal Ozen, Defendant, represented by Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

Nihat Nbayhan, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

Staci Reimer, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

Heather Prekup, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

Sevde Aslane, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

Sibel Cancurt, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

Robert Lichtscheidl, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

Roberto Barajas Thomas, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

G William Franz, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

Jennifer Robertson, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

Hatoon Dablouk, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

Ersin Koncur, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

Winston John, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

Gloria Myers, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

Alexandra Goldblatt McCarron, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Schulman , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP & Christopher H. Schulz , Schulman Lopez Hoffer & Adelstein LLP.

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the district court referred this case to the United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial management. See New Case Notes [ECF No. 1]. For the following reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases