CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH v. FLUOR CORPORATION

Case No. 10-cv-05105-WHO (JCS).

CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, Plaintiffs, v. FLUOR CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

April 3, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 893 Environmental Matters
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fluor Corporation, Defendant, represented by Thomas Michael Donnelly, Jones Day.

Fluor Corporation, Defendant, represented by Daniel Lawrence Corbett, Jones Day.

The Shiloh Group, Intervenor, represented by Brian Charles Carter, Carter, Momsen Knight, Brian Scott Momsen, Carter Momsen & Knight LLP & Matisse M. Knight, Carter, Momsen and Knight, PC.

Fluor Corporation, Counter-claimant, represented by Thomas Michael Donnelly, Jones Day & Daniel Lawrence Corbett, Jones Day.

The Shiloh Group, Counter-defendant, represented by Brian Charles Carter, Carter, Momsen Knight, Brian Scott Momsen, Carter Momsen & Knight LLP & Matisse M. Knight, Carter, Momsen and Knight, PC.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 309

I. INTRODUCTION

This environmental action was originally brought as a citizen's suit and involved past and present owners of a property ("the TSG Property") that is currently owned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases