1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. LM INSURANCE COMPANY v. ALL-PLY ROOFING CO., INC.
 

LM INSURANCE COMPANY v. ALL-PLY ROOFING CO., INC.

Civil Action No. 14-4723 (JMV).

LM INSURANCE COMPANY and LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. ALL-PLY ROOFING CO., INC. and JAMES DURANTE, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

March 27, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 110 Insurance
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

LM INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, represented by JONATHAN MARK KULLER , Goldberg Segalla LLP.

LM INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, represented by ANTHONY J. GOLOWSKI, II , Goldberg Segalla LLP, DAVIS J. KIM , GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP & MEGAN MARIE KOSOVICH , Goldberg Segalla LLP.

LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, represented by JONATHAN MARK KULLER , Goldberg Segalla LLP, ANTHONY J. GOLOWSKI, II , Goldberg Segalla LLP, DAVIS J. KIM , GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP & MEGAN MARIE KOSOVICH , Goldberg Segalla LLP.

ALL-PLY ROOFING CO., INC., Defendant, represented by BRADLEY JUSTYN WEIL , MARK RENART PECK , FLORIO, PERRUCCI, STEINHARDT & FADER, LLC & WILLIAM J. ROCA .

JAMES DURANTE, Defendant, represented by MARK RENART PECK , Florio Perrucci Steinhardt & Fader.

ALL-PLY ROOFING CO., INC., Counter Claimant, represented by BRADLEY JUSTYN WEIL

ALL-PLY ROOFING CO., INC., Counter Claimant, represented by MARK RENART PECK , FLORIO, PERRUCCI, STEINHARDT & FADER, LLC & WILLIAM J. ROCA .

LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Counter Defendant, represented by JONATHAN MARK KULLER , Goldberg Segalla LLP, ANTHONY J. GOLOWSKI, II , Goldberg Segalla LLP, DAVIS J. KIM , GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP & MEGAN MARIE KOSOVICH , Goldberg Segalla LLP.

ALL-PLY ROOFING CO., INC., Third Party Plaintiff, represented by BRADLEY JUSTYN WEIL .

ALL-PLY ROOFING CO., INC., Third Party Plaintiff, represented by MARK RENART PECK , FLORIO, PERRUCCI, STEINHARDT & FADER, LLC, NAVARRO WALKER GRAY , The Gray Law Firm, LLC & WILLIAM J. ROCA .

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before the Court is Defendants' motion for leave to file a third-party complaint. [ECF No. 122.] The motion is opposed. No oral argument is necessary. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. For the reasons stated below, the motion is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases