1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HOLZHAUER v. GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
 

HOLZHAUER v. GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT

Case No. 13-cv-02862-JST.

MARY HOLZHAUER, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

March 27, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 340 Marine
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary Holzhauer, Plaintiff, represented by Edward M. Bull, III , Brodsky Micklow Bull & Weiss LLP.

Mary Holzhauer, Plaintiff, represented by Kurt Leonard Micklow , Brodsky Micklow Bull & Weiss LLP.

Golden Gate Bridge Highway & Transportation District, Defendant, represented by David Eugene Russo , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP & Matthew William James Johnston , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP.

Unites States of America, Miscellaneous, represented by Rebecca Ann Falk , United States Attorney's Office.

David P. Rhoades, Counter-claimant, represented by John D. Giffin , Keesal Young & Logan, Francesca Marcella Lanpher , Keesal, Young & Logan, Garrett Wynne , Keesal, Young & Logan, Lindsay R. McKasson , Weltin Streb & Weltin, LLP & Philip Ross Weltin , Weltin Streb & Weltin, LLP.

Mary Holzhauer, Counter-defendant, represented by Edward M. Bull, III , Brodsky Micklow Bull & Weiss LLP, Ann Sharon Kaplan , Buresh Kaplan Feller & Chang & Kurt Leonard Micklow , Brodsky Micklow Bull & Weiss LLP.

David P. Rhoades, Cross-claimant, represented by John D. Giffin , Keesal Young & Logan, Francesca Marcella Lanpher , Keesal, Young & Logan & Garrett Wynne , Keesal, Young & Logan.

Golden Gate Bridge Highway & Transportation District, Cross-defendant, represented by David Eugene Russo , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP & Matthew William James Johnston , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP.

Golden Gate Bridge Highway & Transportation District, Cross-claimant, represented by David Eugene Russo , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP & Matthew William James Johnston , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP.

Mary Holzhauer, Cross-defendant, represented by Edward M. Bull, III , Brodsky Micklow Bull & Weiss LLP, Ann Sharon Kaplan , Buresh Kaplan Feller & Chang & Kurt Leonard Micklow , Brodsky Micklow Bull & Weiss LLP.

Golden Gate Bridge Highway & Transportation District, Counter-claimant, represented by David Eugene Russo , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP & Matthew William James Johnston , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP.

David P. Rhoades, Counter-defendant, represented by Francesca Marcella Lanpher , Keesal, Young & Logan & Garrett Wynne , Keesal, Young & Logan.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND/OR NEW TRIAL

Re: ECF No. 336

Now before the Court is Defendant Golden Gate Bridge Highway & Transportation District's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and/or New Trial. ECF No. 336. The Court will deny the motion.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases