NAPOLES v. ROGERS

Case No. 1:16-cv-01933-DAD-JLT.

RONALD NAPOLES, LAURINE NAPOLES, RICK NAPOLES, MARK NAPOLES, JAMES NAPOLES, DEBRA WILLIAMS, and WADE WILLIAMS, Petitioners, v. DESTON ROGERS, JEFF ROMERO, BRIAN PONCHO, EARLEEN WILLIAMS, WILLIAM "BILL" VEGA, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBAL COUNCIL; BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBAL COUNCIL; TRIBAL COURT JUDGE BILL KOCKENMEISTER IN HIS INDIVIDUAL OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Respondents.

United States District Court, E.D. California, Fresno Division.

March 15, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Cause: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus (General)
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ron Napoles, Plaintiff, represented by Andrea Seielstad , University of Dayton School of Law, Law Clinic, pro hac vice.

Ron Napoles, Plaintiff, represented by Jack Duran, Jr. , Duran Law Office.

Laurine Napoles, Plaintiff, represented by Andrea Seielstad , University of Dayton School of Law, Law Clinic, pro hac vice & Jack Duran, Jr. , Duran Law Office.

Rick Napoles, Plaintiff, represented by Andrea Seielstad , University of Dayton School of Law, Law Clinic, pro hac vice & Jack Duran, Jr. , Duran Law Office.

James Napoles, Plaintiff, represented by Andrea Seielstad , University of Dayton School of Law, Law Clinic, pro hac vice & Jack Duran, Jr. , Duran Law Office.

Mark Napoles, Plaintiff, represented by Andrea Seielstad , University of Dayton School of Law, Law Clinic, pro hac vice & Jack Duran, Jr. , Duran Law Office.

Debra Williams, Plaintiff, represented by Andrea Seielstad , University of Dayton School of Law, Law Clinic, pro hac vice & Jack Duran, Jr. , Duran Law Office.

Wade Williams, Plaintiff, represented by Andrea Seielstad , University of Dayton School of Law, Law Clinic, pro hac vice & Jack Duran, Jr. , Duran Law Office.


STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: [PROPOSED] ORDER (Doc. 13)

The above named Petitioners ("Petitioners") and Respondents ("Respondents") hereby stipulate, pursuant to Local Rule (LR) 143, to continue the Scheduling Conference, currently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases