GoPRO, INC. v. C&A MARKETING, INC.

Case No. 3:16-cv-03590-JST.

GOPRO, INC., Plaintiff, v. C&A MARKETING, INC., C&A LICENSING, LLC, AND PLR IP HOLDINGS, LLC, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

March 9, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

GoPro, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP.

GoPro, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Darius C. Samerotte , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP & Steven David Moore , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP.

C&A Marketing, Inc., Defendant, represented by Esther Kim Chang , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Nathaniel Bryan Sabri , Morrison & Foerster LLP & Michael A. Jacobs , Morrison & Foerster LLP.

C&A Licensing, LLC, Defendant, represented by Esther Kim Chang , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Nathaniel Bryan Sabri , Morrison & Foerster LLP & Michael A. Jacobs , Morrison & Foerster LLP.

PLR IP Holdings, LLC, Defendant, represented by Esther Kim Chang , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Nathaniel Bryan Sabri , Morrison & Foerster LLP & Michael A. Jacobs , Morrison & Foerster LLP.

PLR IP Holdings, LLC, Counter-claimant, represented by Esther Kim Chang , Morrison & Foerster LLP & Michael A. Jacobs , Morrison & Foerster LLP.

C&A Licensing, LLC, Counter-claimant, represented by Esther Kim Chang , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Nathaniel Bryan Sabri , Morrison & Foerster LLP & Michael A. Jacobs , Morrison & Foerster LLP.

C&A Marketing, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by Esther Kim Chang , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Nathaniel Bryan Sabri , Morrison & Foerster LLP & Michael A. Jacobs , Morrison & Foerster LLP.

GoPro, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Darius C. Samerotte , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP & Steven David Moore , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP.


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO SERVE DAMAGES CONTENTIONS AND RESPONSIVE DAMAGES CONTENTIONS

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff GoPro, Inc. ("GoPro") and Defendants C&A Marketing, Inc.; C&A Licensing, LLC; and PLR IP Holdings, LLC...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases