1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 239 F.Supp.3d
  5. 239 F.Supp.3d 822 (2017)
 

RECKITT BENCKISER LLC v. AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD.

C.A. No. 14-1203-LPS.

239 F.Supp.3d 822 (2017)

RECKITT BENCKISER LLC, Plaintiff, v. AUROBINDO PHARMA LIMITED and Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

UNSEALED ON MARCH 7, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Lennon and Pilar G. Kraman, YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP, Wilmington, DE

John T. Gutkoski, Douglas J. Nash, Bella S. Satra, and F. Paul Vellano, III, BARCLAY DAMON, LLP, Boston, MA Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Mary B. Matterer and Richard K. Herrmann, MORRIS JAMES LLP, Wilmington, DE.

Timothy H. Kratz, George J. Barry III, and Meghan M. Rachford, McGUIREWOODS LLP, Atlanta, GA Attorneys for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Reckitt Benckiser ("Reckitt") brought this patent infringement action under the Hatch-Waxman Act. Reckitt filed suit against Defendants Aurobindo Pharma Limited and Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. (collectively, "Aurobindo"), which had submitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases