1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY v. KLEIN
 

CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY v. KLEIN

Case No. CV 16-05968 DDP (MRWx).

CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, ET AL., Plaintiff, v. JAMES A. KLEIN, ET AL., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

March 3, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

California Expanded Metal Products Company, Plaintiff, represented by Dylan C. Dang , Trojan Law Offices.

California Expanded Metal Products Company, Plaintiff, represented by R. Joseph Trojan , Trojan Law Offices.

Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Ann G. Schoen , Frost Brown Todd LLC, pro hac vice, Ira G. Rivin , Rutan and Tucker LLP & Jeffrey Kersting , Frost Brown Todd LLC, pro hac vice.

James A Klein, Defendant, represented by Omero Banuelos , Rimon PC, Paul H. Beattie , Rimon PC, pro hac vice & Thomas E. Loop , Loop Intellectual Property Law PLLC, pro hac vice.

BlazeFrame Industries, Ltd, Defendant, represented by Omero Banuelos , Rimon PC, Paul H. Beattie , Rimon PC, pro hac vice & Thomas E. Loop , Loop Intellectual Property Law PLLC, pro hac vice.

BlazeFrame Industries, Ltd, Counter Claimant, represented by Omero Banuelos , Rimon PC, Paul H. Beattie , Rimon PC & Thomas E. Loop , Loop Intellectual Property Law PLLC.

James A Klein, Counter Claimant, represented by Omero Banuelos , Rimon PC, Paul H. Beattie , Rimon PC & Thomas E. Loop , Loop Intellectual Property Law PLLC.

California Expanded Metal Products Company, Counter Defendant, represented by Dylan C. Dang , Trojan Law Offices & R. Joseph Trojan , Trojan Law Offices.

Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Ann G. Schoen , Frost Brown Todd LLC, Ira G. Rivin , Rutan and Tucker LLP & Jeffrey Kersting , Frost Brown Todd LLC.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

[Dkt. 46]

Presently before the court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Affirmative Defenses. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the court grants the motion and adopts the following Order.

I. Background...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases