1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. EZ PEDO, INC. v. MAYCLIN DENTAL STUDIO, INC.
 

EZ PEDO, INC. v. MAYCLIN DENTAL STUDIO, INC.

Case No. 2:16-cv-00731-KJM-CKD.

EZ PEDO, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. MAYCLIN DENTAL STUDIO, INC., a Minnesota corporation, individually and dba KINDER KROWNS; and DOES 1-10, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

February 28, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nature of Suit: 840 Trademark
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

EZ Pedo, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Michael Leon Meeks , Buchalter, A Professional Corporation.

EZ Pedo, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Paul J. Fraidenburgh , Buchalter, A Professional Corporation.

Mayclin Dental Studio, Inc., Defendant, represented by Adam Payson Gislason , Fox Rothschild LLP & Timothy C. Matson , Fox Rothschild LLP, pro hac vice.

ORDER

Pursuant to Local Rule 143, all parties hereby request the Court's approval of the following stipulation amending the Amended Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order (Dkt. 24)[hereinafter "Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order"], as previously amended by to modify the expert disclosure and report deadlines...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases