MARC LILLY, NOT IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT AS THE REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE FORMER SHAREHOLDERS OF VIEOSOFT, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
ENVOY, LLC; EMDEON, INC.; EMDEON BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC; TOM GROOM (named as an indispensable party), Defendants.
United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Change Healthcare Solutions LLC, Defendant, represented by Overton Thompson, III , BASS BERRY & SIMS, pro hac vice, Shayne R. Clinton , BASS BERRY & SIMS, pro hac vice, Steven W. Fogg , CORR CRONIN MICHELSON BAUMGARDNER FOGG & MOORE LLP & David B. Edwards , CORR CRONIN MICHELSON BAUMGARDNER FOGG & MOORE LLP.
Change Healthcare Holdings Inc, Defendant, represented by Overton Thompson, III , BASS BERRY & SIMS, pro hac vice, Shayne R. Clinton , BASS BERRY & SIMS, pro hac vice, Steven W. Fogg , CORR CRONIN MICHELSON BAUMGARDNER FOGG & MOORE LLP & David B. Edwards , CORR CRONIN MICHELSON BAUMGARDNER FOGG & MOORE LLP.
Change Healthcare Operations LLC, Defendant, represented by Overton Thompson, III , BASS BERRY & SIMS, pro hac vice, Shayne R. Clinton , BASS BERRY & SIMS, pro hac vice, Steven W. Fogg , CORR CRONIN MICHELSON BAUMGARDNER FOGG & MOORE LLP & David B. Edwards , CORR CRONIN MICHELSON BAUMGARDNER FOGG & MOORE LLP.
Peter Hoover, Counter Defendant, represented by John E. Casperson , HOLMES WEDDLE & BARCOTT.
John Eastman, Counter Defendant, represented by John E. Casperson , HOLMES WEDDLE & BARCOTT.
David Grant, Counter Defendant, represented by Brian Daucher , SHEPPARD MULLIN, pro hac vice & John E. Casperson , HOLMES WEDDLE & BARCOTT.
Marc Lilly, Counter Defendant, represented by Abby Meyer , SHEPPARD MULLIN, pro hac vice, Brian Daucher , SHEPPARD MULLIN, pro hac vice, Dan Bane , SHEPPARD MULLIN, pro hac vice & John E. Casperson , HOLMES WEDDLE & BARCOTT.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60(b). Dkt. #101. Plaintiff asserts that this Court committed manifest error...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
