1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GORBACHEVA v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES EXTENDED DISABILITY PLAN
 

GORBACHEVA v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES EXTENDED DISABILITY PLAN

Case No. 5:14-cv-02524-EJD.

OLGA GORBACHEVA, Plaintiff, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES EXTENDED DISABILITY PLAN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

February 15, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Olga Gorbacheva, Plaintiff, represented by James Pieper Keenley , Bolt Keenley Kim LLP.

Olga Gorbacheva, Plaintiff, represented by Brian Henry Kim , Bolt Keenley Kim LLP & Emily A. Bolt , Bolt Keenley Kim LLP.

Abbott Laboratories Extended Disability Plan, Defendant, represented by Emily Claire Schuman , Winston and Strawn LLP, Heather Suzanne Lehman , Winston and Strawn LLP, Joseph James Torres , Winston & Strawn LLP & Robb Christopher Adkins , Winston and Strawn LLP.

Abbott Laboratories Annuity Retirement Plan, Defendant, represented by Emily Claire Schuman , Heather Suzanne Lehman , Winston and Strawn LLP, Joseph James Torres , Winston & Strawn LLP & Robb Christopher Adkins , Winston and Strawn LLP.

Abbott Laboratories Retiree Health Care Plan, Defendant, represented by Emily Claire Schuman , Heather Suzanne Lehman , Winston and Strawn LLP, Joseph James Torres , Winston & Strawn LLP & Robb Christopher Adkins , Winston and Strawn LLP.

Abbott Laboratories Inc., Defendant, represented by Emily Claire Schuman , Heather Suzanne Lehman , Winston and Strawn LLP, Joseph James Torres , Winston & Strawn LLP & Robb Christopher Adkins , Winston and Strawn LLP.

James Sipes, Defendant, represented by Emily Claire Schuman , Heather Suzanne Lehman , Winston and Strawn LLP, Joseph James Torres , Winston & Strawn LLP & Robb Christopher Adkins , Winston and Strawn LLP.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Re: Dkt. No. 62

Presently before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs. Dkt. No. 62. Based on the unresolved posture of the case and for the reasons explained briefly below, the court DENIES Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases