GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. CITY OF WATSONVILLE

Case No. 16-cv-03987 NC.

GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WATSONVILLE, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

February 7, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership, Plaintiff, represented by James A. Heard, Mackenzie & Albritton LLP.

City of Watsonville, Defendant, represented by Kate Elizabeth Collins, The Grunsky Law Firm PC.


ORDER GRANTING GTE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Re: Dkt. No. 36

This case arises from defendant City of Watsonville's denial of plaintiff GTE's application to place a wireless communications facility on a parcel within the City. GTE complains of violations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases