1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 230 F.Supp.3d
  5. 230 F.Supp.3d 10 (2017)
 

CRANE SEC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. ROLLING OPTICS, AB

Civil Action No. 14-12428-LTS.

230 F.Supp.3d 10 (2017)

CRANE SECURITY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and Visual Physics, LLC, Plaintiffs/Defendants-in Counterclaim, v. ROLLING OPTICS, AB Defendant/Plaintiff-in Counterclaim.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Signed February 3, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne L. Stoner, Benjamin N. Ernst, Brian J. Driscoll, Michael A. Greene, Sydenham B. Alexander, III, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, Mary R. Bonzagni, Holland & Bonzagni, PC, Longmeadow, MA, for Plaintiffs/Defendants-in Counterclaim.

Robert H. Stier, Jr., Margaret K. Minister, Nolan L. Reichl, Pierce Atwood LLP, Portland, ME, Daniel A. Lev, Pierce Atwood LLP, Boston, MA, for Defendant/Plaintiff-in Counterclaim.

ORDER ON ROLLING OPTICS AB'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IMPROPERLY WITHHELD (#192).

I. Introduction

Crane Security Technologies, Inc., is the exclusive licensee of the five U.S. patents at issue in this case.1 The patents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases