1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD. v. KMART CORPORATION
 

SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD. v. KMART CORPORATION

Case No. 2:16-cv-06782-SJO-JEM.

SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD., a Korean corporation, SEOUL VIOSYS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation, and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiffs, v. KMART CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

February 1, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Plaintiff, represented by Charles H. Sanders , Latham and Watkins LLP, pro hac vice.

Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Plaintiff, represented by Lawrence J. Gotts , Latham and Watkins LLP, pro hac vice & Bradley A. Hyde , Latham and Watkins LLP.

Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., Plaintiff, represented by Charles H. Sanders , Latham and Watkins LLP, pro hac vice, Lawrence J. Gotts , Latham and Watkins LLP, pro hac vice & Bradley A. Hyde , Latham and Watkins LLP.

The Regents of the University of California, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Bradley Eisenberg , Holland and Knight LLP, pro hac vice & Stacey Hsiang Chun Wang , Holland and Knight LLP.

K-Mart Corporation, Defendant, represented by David L. Alberti , Feinberg Day Alberti and Thompson LLP, Marc C. Belloli , Feinberg Day Alberti and Thompson LLP, Matthew D. Pearson , Baker and Hostetler LLP, Yakov M. Zolotorev , Feinberg Day Alberti and Thompson LLP & Elizabeth Day , Feinberg Day Alberti and Thompson LLP.

K-Mart Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Elizabeth Day , Feinberg Day Alberti and Thompson LLP.

K-Mart Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Elizabeth Day , Feinberg Day Alberti and Thompson LLP.

K-Mart Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Matthew D. Pearson , Baker and Hostetler LLP & Elizabeth Day , Feinberg Day Alberti and Thompson LLP.

Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Counter Defendant, represented by Charles H. Sanders , Latham and Watkins LLP, Lawrence J. Gotts , Latham and Watkins LLP & Bradley A. Hyde , Latham and Watkins LLP.

Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., Counter Defendant, represented by Charles H. Sanders , Latham and Watkins LLP, Lawrence J. Gotts , Latham and Watkins LLP & Bradley A. Hyde , Latham and Watkins LLP.

The Regents of the University of California, Counter Defendant, represented by Michael Bradley Eisenberg , Holland and Knight LLP & Stacey Hsiang Chun Wang , Holland and Knight LLP.

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING E-DISCOVERY

Upon the stipulation of the parties, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. This Order supplements all other discovery rules and orders. It streamlines Electronically Stored Information ("ESI") production to promote...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases