1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. RainDANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. 10X GENOMICS, INC.
 

RainDANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. 10X GENOMICS, INC.

Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-00152-RGA.

RAINDANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, Plaintiffs, v. 10X GENOMICS, INC. Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

January 26, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

RainDance Technologies Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

RainDance Technologies Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Derek C. Walter , Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, pro hac vice, Edward R. Reines , Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, pro hac vice & Karen Jacobs , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

University of Chicago, Plaintiff, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP & Karen Jacobs , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

10X Genomics Inc., Defendant, represented by Steven J. Balick , Ashby & Geddes, Andrei Iancu , Irell & Manella LLP, pro hac vice, Andrew Colin Mayo , Ashby & Geddes, David I. Gindler , Irell & Manella LLP, pro hac vice, Elizabeth C. Tuan , Irell & Manella LLP, pro hac vice & Lauren N. Drake , Irell & Manella LLP, pro hac vice.

10X Genomics Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Steven J. Balick , Ashby & Geddes, Andrei Iancu , Irell & Manella LLP, Andrew Colin Mayo , Ashby & Geddes, David I. Gindler , Irell & Manella LLP, Elizabeth C. Tuan , Irell & Manella LLP & Lauren N. Drake , Irell & Manella LLP.

RainDance Technologies Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Derek C. Walter , Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Edward R. Reines , Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP & Karen Jacobs , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

University of Chicago, Counter Defendant, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP & Karen Jacobs , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Presently before the Court is the issue of claim construction of multiple terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 7,129,091 ("the '091 patent"), 8,822,148 ("the '148 patent"), 8,329,407 ("the '407 patent"), 8,304,193 ("the '193 patent"), 8,658,430 ("the '430 patent"), and 8,889,083 ("the '083 patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases