IN RE RIVERA

Lead Case No. LA CV16-04676 JAK (SSx), Consolidated Case No. CV16-04676 JAK (SSx).

In Re: Adrian Rivera, et al. Adrian Rivera, Plaintiff, v. Remington Designs, LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

January 19, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adrian Rivera, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew G. Cunningham , Kundu PLLC, pro hac vice.

Adrian Rivera, Plaintiff, represented by Sudip K. Kundu , Kundu PLLC, pro hac vice & William A. Delgado , Willenken Wilson Loh and Delgado LLP.

Remington Designs, LLC, Defendant, represented by Brian Jason Philpott , Koppel Patrick Heybl and Philpott.

Remington Designs, LLC, Defendant, represented by Corey Alexander Donaldson , Koppel Patrick Heybl and Philpott.

Eko Brands, LLC, Defendant, represented by David A. Lowe , Lowe Graham Jones PLLC, pro hac vice & Tamany Vinson Bentz , Venable LLP.

Espresso Supply, Inc., Defendant, represented by David A. Lowe , Lowe Graham Jones PLLC, pro hac vice & Tamany Vinson Bentz , Venable LLP.

Creative Concepts, Defendant, represented by Ryan Scott McPhee , Bakos Kritzer LLP.

Solofill LLC, Defendant, represented by Sandeep Seth , SethLaw & Tamany Vinson Bentz , Venable LLP.

Solofill LLC, ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Sandeep Seth , SethLaw.

Espresso Supply, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by David A. Lowe , Lowe Graham Jones PLLC, pro hac vice & Tamany Vinson Bentz , Venable LLP.

Eko Brands, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by David A. Lowe , Lowe Graham Jones PLLC, pro hac vice & Tamany Vinson Bentz , Venable LLP.

Solofill LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Sandeep Seth , SethLaw & Tamany Vinson Bentz , Venable LLP.

Adrian Rivera, Counter Defendant, represented by Matthew G. Cunningham , Kundu PLLC, pro hac vice, Sudip K. Kundu , Kundu PLLC, pro hac vice & William A. Delgado , Willenken Wilson Loh and Delgado LLP.


STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1.

A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases