1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 229 F.Supp.3d
  5. 229 F.Supp.3d 809 (2017)
 

WHITAKER v. APPRISS, INC.

Cause No. 3:13-cv-826 RLM-MGG.

229 F.Supp.3d 809 (2017)

Rachel A. WHITAKER and Richard L. Dunkin, Plaintiffs, v. APPRISS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division.

Signed January 17, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 18 U.S.C. § 2721
Cause: 18 U.S.C. § 2721 Unlawful release of personal information from State motor vehicle records
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adam J. Levitt, Grant & Eisenhofer PA, Chicago, IL, Andrew B. Miller, Scott L. Starr, Starr Austen & Miller LLP, Logansport, IN, Brenda Szydlo PHV, Grant & Eisenhofer PA, New York, NY, Kyle J. McGee PHV, Raymond F. Schuenemann PHV, Grant & Eisenhofer PA, Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiffs.

Anthony David Gill PHV, DLA Piper LLP (US), Washington, DC, Keara Marie Gordon PHV, DLA Piper LLP (US), New York, NY, Stephen B. Pence PHV, Pence & Ogburn PLLC, Louisville, KY, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

Defendant Appriss moves that the court dismiss the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on the grounds that the named plaintiffs don't have standing to sue. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1); U.S. Const. art. III, § 1. The court holds that the plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases