NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS LLC v. PICKER

Case No. 16-cv-02461-VC.

NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL PICKER, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

January 12, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew Henry Marmolejo, Mayer Brown, LLP.

New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Michael K. Kellogg, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans and Figel, P.L.L.C., pro hac vice, Christian Frederick Binnig, Mayer Brown LLP, pro hac vice, Collin R. White, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans and Figel, pro hac vice, David P. Discher, AT&T Services, Inc., David Jeffrey Miller, AT&T Services, Inc., Gregory Lee Castle, ATT Services, Isabelle Marie Salgado, AT&T Services, Inc., J. Covey Tyson, Mayer Brown, LLP, Jay Tyson Covey, Mayer Brown LLP, pro hac vice & Scott Harris Angstreich, Kellogg Huber Hansen Todd Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C..

Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew Henry Marmolejo, Mayer Brown LLP, Michael K. Kellogg, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans and Figel, P.L.L.C., pro hac vice, Christian Frederick Binnig, Mayer Brown LLP, pro hac vice, Collin R. White, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans and Figel, pro hac vice, David P. Discher, AT&T Services, Inc., David Jeffrey Miller, AT&T Services, Inc., Gregory Lee Castle, ATT Services, Isabelle Marie Salgado, AT&T Services, Inc., J. Covey Tyson, Mayer Brown LLP, Jay Tyson Covey, Mayer Brown LLP, pro hac vice & Scott Harris Angstreich, Kellogg Huber Hansen Todd Evans and Figel, P.L.L.C., pro hac vice.

California Cable & Telecommunications Association, Plaintiff, represented by Lesla Jean Lehtonen, California Cable & Telecommunications Association.

Comcast Phone of California, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Martin L. Fineman, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Peter Karanjia, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, pro hac vice & Suzanne Kathleen Toller, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.

Cox California Telcom, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Rees Ferriter Morgan, Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass LLP, Margaret L. Tobias, Tobias Law Office & Richard Ralph Patch, Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass, LLP.

CTIA - The Wireless Association, Plaintiff, represented by Michael B. Day, Goodin MacBride Squeri & Day LLP.

Cellco Partnership, Plaintiff, represented by Henry Weissmann, Munger Tolles & Olson LLP, Christa Leigh Culver, Munger Tolles and Olson LLP, Fred Anthony Rowley, Munger Tolles & Olson LLP & Rudolph Munguia Reyes, Jr., Verizon Wireless.

MCI Communications Services, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Henry Weissmann, Munger Tolles & Olson LLP, Christa Leigh Culver, Munger Tolles and Olson LLP, Fred Anthony Rowley, Munger Tolles & Olson LLP & Rudolph Munguia Reyes, Jr., Verizon Wireless.

Michael Picker, Defendant, represented by Christine Jun Hammond, California Public Utilities Commission, Christopher Paul Witteman, California Public Utilities Commission, Helen Marie Mickiewicz, California Public Utilities Commission & Kimberly June Lippi, California Public Utilities Commission.

Mike Florio, Defendant, represented by Christine Jun Hammond, California Public Utilities Commission, Christopher Paul Witteman, California Public Utilities Commission, Helen Marie Mickiewicz, California Public Utilities Commission & Kimberly June Lippi, California Public Utilities Commission.

Catherine J. K. Sandoval, Defendant, represented by Christine Jun Hammond, California Public Utilities Commission, Christopher Paul Witteman, California Public Utilities Commission, Helen Marie Mickiewicz, California Public Utilities Commission & Kimberly June Lippi, California Public Utilities Commission.

Carla J. Peterman, Defendant, represented by Christine Jun Hammond, California Public Utilities Commission, Christopher Paul Witteman, California Public Utilities Commission, Helen Marie Mickiewicz, California Public Utilities Commission & Kimberly June Lippi, California Public Utilities Commission.

Liane M. Randolph, Defendant, represented by Christine Jun Hammond, California Public Utilities Commission, Christopher Paul Witteman, California Public Utilities Commission, Helen Marie Mickiewicz, California Public Utilities Commission & Kimberly June Lippi, California Public Utilities Commission.

Karl Bemesderfer, Defendant, represented by Kimberly June Lippi, California Public Utilities Commission.

TURN - The Utility Reform Network, Defendant, represented by Christine Ann Mailloux, The Utility Reform Network.

National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Amicus, represented by James Bradford Ramsay, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, pro hac vice.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In a regulatory proceeding, the CPUC ordered the plaintiffs to disclose subscription data to third parties. The plaintiffs filed this lawsuit to prevent the CPUC from enforcing the order, contending that it was preempted by federal law and violated the Fourth Amendment. This court preliminarily...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases