1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. STUEBING AUTOMATIC MACHINE COMPANY v. GAVRONSKY
 

STUEBING AUTOMATIC MACHINE COMPANY v. GAVRONSKY

Case No. 1:16-cv-576.

STUEBING AUTOMATIC MACHINE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ALLAN GAVRONSKY, doing business as MATAMOROS MACHINE SHOP, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

December 20, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuebing Automatic Machine Company, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa M. A. Nolan, Wood Herron & Evans LLP.

Stuebing Automatic Machine Company, Plaintiff, represented by Charles Hampton Brown, III, Wood, Herron & Evans, LLP.

Steve Lerma, Defendant, Pro Se.

Steve Lerma, Counter Claimant, Pro Se.

Stuebing Automatic Machine Company, Counter Defendant, represented by Lisa M. A. Nolan, Wood Herron & Evans LLP, Charles Hampton Brown, III, Wood, Herron & Evans, LLP, Lisa M. A. Nolan, Wood Herron & Evans LLP & Charles Hampton Brown, III, Wood, Herron & Evans, LLP.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Stuebing Automatic Machine Company's motions to dismiss the counterclaims of pro se defendants Allan Gavronsky and Steve Lerma. (Docs. 17 and 18). Defendants have not filed responses to the motions to dismiss.

I. Background...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases