1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DOMINION PIPE & PILING v. CITY OF KODIAK
 

DOMINION PIPE & PILING v. CITY OF KODIAK

Case No. C16-1699-JCC.

DOMINION PIPE & PILING, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF KODIAK, Defendant. DOMINION PIPE & PILING, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. PACIFIC PILE & MARINE, L.P., et al., Third-Party Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.

January 5, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Notice of Removal
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dominion Pipe & Piling, Plaintiff, represented by Craig M. Simmons , ROMERO PARK & WIGGINS.

Dominion Pipe & Piling, Plaintiff, represented by H. Troy Romero , ROMERO PARK & WIGGINS.

City of Kodiak, Defendant, represented by Adam W. Cook , BIRCH HORTON BITTNER & CHEROT, pro hac vice, Joseph John Straus , SCHWABE WILLIAMSON & WYATT, Katherine Davies , BIRCH HORTON BITTNER & CHEROT, pro hac vice & Marti McCaleb , SCHWABE WILLIAMSON & WYATT.

City of Kodiak, Counter Claimant, represented by Adam W. Cook , BIRCH HORTON BITTNER & CHEROT, Joseph John Straus , SCHWABE WILLIAMSON & WYATT, Katherine Davies , BIRCH HORTON BITTNER & CHEROT & Marti McCaleb , SCHWABE WILLIAMSON & WYATT.

Dominion Pipe & Piling, Counter Defendant, represented by Craig M. Simmons , ROMERO PARK & WIGGINS & H. Troy Romero , ROMERO PARK & WIGGINS.

Dominion Pipe & Piling, ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Craig M. Simmons , ROMERO PARK & WIGGINS & H. Troy Romero , ROMERO PARK & WIGGINS.

Pacific Pile & Marine, L.P., ThirdParty Defendant, represented by Adam W. Cook , BIRCH HORTON BITTNER & CHEROT, pro hac vice, Katherine Davies , BIRCH HORTON BITTNER & CHEROT, pro hac vice, Marti McCaleb , SCHWABE WILLIAMSON & WYATT & Joseph John Straus , SCHWABE WILLIAMSON & WYATT.

ORDER DENYING CITY OF KODIAK'S MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant City of Kodiak's motion to change venue (Dkt. No. 12). Having thoroughly considered the parties' briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary and hereby DENIES the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases