1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. 84 LUMBER COMPANY, L.P. v. GREGORY MORTIMER BUILDERS
 

84 LUMBER COMPANY, L.P. v. GREGORY MORTIMER BUILDERS

Civil Action No. 11-548.

84 LUMBER COMPANY, L.P., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. GREGORY MORTIMER BUILDERS, et al., Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

January 3, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Other Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

84 LUMBER COMPANY, L.P., Plaintiff, represented by Alexander W. Saksen , Gordon & Rees.

84 LUMBER COMPANY, L.P., Plaintiff, represented by Richard T. Victoria , Gordon & Rees LLP & S. Manoj Jegasothy , Gordon & Rees LLP.

JOHN E. LIPPL, Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by John E. Lippl .

GREGORY MORTIMER BUILDERS, Defendant, represented by Andrew J. Lawrence , The Lawrence Law Group, PLLC, pro hac vice.

GREGORY MORTIMER, Defendant, represented by Andrew J. Lawrence , The Lawrence Law Group, PLLC, pro hac vice.

GREGORY D. MORTIMER PROPERTIES, INC, Counter Claimant, represented by Andrew J. Lawrence , The Lawrence Law Group, PLLC, pro hac vice.

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Movant, represented by Kevin J. Pascale , Rosenberg Martin Greenberg, LLP, pro hac vice, Louis J. Ebert , Rosenberg Martin Greenberg LLP, pro hac vice & William L. Hallam , Rosenberg Martin Greenberg, LLP.

GREGORY MORTIMER, Counter Claimant, represented by Andrew J. Lawrence , The Lawrence Law Group, PLLC, pro hac vice.

84 LUMBER COMPANY, L.P., Counter Defendant, represented by Alexander W. Saksen , Gordon & Rees, Richard T. Victoria , Gordon & Rees LLP & S. Manoj Jegasothy , Gordon & Rees LLP.

GREGORY MORTIMER BUILDERS, Counter Claimant, represented by Andrew J. Lawrence , The Lawrence Law Group, PLLC, pro hac vice.

GREGORY MORTIMER, Counter Claimant, represented by Andrew J. Lawrence , The Lawrence Law Group, PLLC, pro hac vice.

84 LUMBER COMPANY, L.P., Counter Defendant, represented by Alexander W. Saksen , Gordon & Rees, Richard T. Victoria , Gordon & Rees LLP & S. Manoj Jegasothy , Gordon & Rees LLP.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER

ECF No. 225

I. SUMMATION

For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny Defendant's Motion to Reconsider Memorandum Opinion on Contractual Damage Limitations (...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases