1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 222 F.Supp.3d
  5. 222 F.Supp.3d 779 (2016)
 

CLAIR v. CVS PHARMACY, INC.

Case No. 16-cv-04911-VC.

222 F.Supp.3d 779 (2016)

Michael St. CLAIR, Plaintiff, v. CVS PHARMACY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed December 30, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Trinette Gragirena Kent, Kent Law Offices, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff.

Mark Stephen Eisen, David S. Almeida, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Chicago, IL, Tenaya M. Rodewald, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

Michael St. Clair has sued CVS Pharmacy under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for sending automated calls to his cell phone about prescription refills, even after he requested that the calls stop. Specifically...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases