VIDRIO v. GIPSON

No. 1:16-cv-00021 SKO.

OSCAR VIDRIO, Plaintiff, v. C. GIPSON, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California, Fresno Division.

December 13, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oscar Vidrio, Plaintiff, represented by Peter M. Williamson , Williamson Law Firm.

Warden Connie Gipson, Defendant, represented by Byron M. Miller , California Attorney General's Office.

Warden Dave Davey, Defendant, represented by Byron M. Miller , California Attorney General's Office.


SECOND REQUEST AND STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER EXTENDING NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE

REQUEST TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER

A scheduling order may be modified upon a showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). Good cause exists when the deadline...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases