1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. KAYMARK v. UDREN LAW OFFICES, P.C.
 

KAYMARK v. UDREN LAW OFFICES, P.C.

Civil Action No. 13-419.

DALE KAYMARK, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated current and former homeowners in Pennsylvania Plaintiff, Judge Cathy Bissoon v. UDREN LAW OFFICES, P.C., Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

December 12, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal - - Other Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

DALE KAYMARK, Plaintiff, represented by Michael P. Malakoff, Michael P. Malakoff, PC.

DALE KAYMARK, Plaintiff, represented by Trent A. Echard, Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Gefsky.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant, represented by Jonathan J. Bart, Wilentz Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., Thomas L. Allen, Reed Smith & Andrew J. Soven, Reed Smith LLP.

UDREN LAW OFFICES, P.C., Defendant, represented by Jonathan J. Bart, Wilentz Goldman & Spitzer, P.A..

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Renewed Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 75), filed by Defendant Udren Law Offices, P.C. ("Udren") pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons that follow, Udren's Motion will be DENIED.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases