1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. NEMCIK v. STEVENS
 

NEMCIK v. STEVENS

Case No. 16-cv-00322-BLF.

TANYA NEMCIK, Plaintiff, v. STACEY STEVENS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

December 6, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tanya Nemcik, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Stacey Stevens, Defendant, represented by Martin D. Dioli , Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley.

Victoria Henley, Defendant, represented by John P. Devine , Office of the Attorney General.

Brian Krippendorf, Interested Party, Pro Se.

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR FILING AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

On October 26, 2016, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed for Plaintiff Tanya Nemcik ("Nemcik")'s failure to file an amended complaint by the September 16, 2016 deadline...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases