1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BALIK v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.
 

BALIK v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.

Case No. 16-cv-05101-HSG.

JEREMIAH W. BALIK, Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

November 23, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 2000e
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeremiah W. Balik, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Time Warner Cable, Inc., Defendant, represented by James A. Bowles , Hill, Farrer & Burrill, LLP.

Next Generation Wireless, Defendant, represented by John F. Friedemann, Esq. , Friedemann Goldberg LLP.

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Defendant, represented by Hope A. Case , Sacks, Ricketts & Case LLP.

City of Cedar Falls, Defendant, represented by John F. Friedemann, Esq. , Friedemann Goldberg LLP.

Sprint Inc./United Management Company, Defendant, represented by Robert Anthony Escalante , Proskauer Rose LLP, Harold M. Brody , Proskauer Rose LLP & Tracey Lynne Silver , Proskauer Rose LLP.

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT, DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE, AND TERMINATING AS MOOT MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 23, 26, 27, 35, 49, 57

Pending before the Court are six motions: (1) pro se Plaintiff Jeremiah Balik's motion for default judgment, Dkt....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases