1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HAMIDI v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 1000
 

HAMIDI v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 1000

Case No. 2:14-CV-319-WBS-KJN.

KOUROSH KENNETH HAMIDI, et al., AND THE CLASS THEY SEEK TO REPRESENT Plaintiffs, v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 1000, AND JOHN CHIANG, Controller, State of California; Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

November 23, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kourosh Kenneth Hamidi, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice.

Kourosh Kenneth Hamidi, Plaintiff, represented by Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

Kim McElroy, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice & Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

Dawn P. Ammons, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice & Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

William L. Blaylock, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice & Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

Christopher Browne, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice & Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

Ryan Christensen, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice & Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

Kelli Giles, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice & Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

Madeline L. Lopez, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice & Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

Clint Miller, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice & Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

Gary W. Morrish, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice & Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

Virginia Ollis, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice & Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

Olayemi Sarumi, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice & Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

Cecilia Stanfield, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice & Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

Antonia Toledo, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice & Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

Diane C. Tutt, Plaintiff, represented by W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Inc, pro hac vice & Steven R. Burlingham, Gary Till and Burlingham.

Service Employees International Union, Local 1000, Defendant, represented by Jeffrey B. Demain, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Anne Marie Giese, Service Employees International Union, Local 1000, Eric Prince Brown, Altschuler Berzon, LLP, Eve H. Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon Llp, Patrick Casey Pitts, Altshuler Berzon, LLP & York Jiann Chang, SEIU Local 1000.

John Chiang, Defendant, represented by Kim L. Nguyen, Office Of The Attorney General & Mark Randolph Beckington, Attorney General's Office for the State of California.

CLASS ACTION STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF REMAINING BRIEFING ON PARTIES' CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TO THE COURT:

The parties to the above-captioned case hereby submit the following stipulation for extensions on the remaining briefing on the parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases