1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BLACK v. WORKMAN
 

BLACK v. WORKMAN

Civil Action No. 16-219.

DAVID J. BLACK, v. RICHARD WORKMAN, ROBERT JONES, JOSEPH TREMPUS AND FRANK J. KAMALICH.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

November 22, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

DAVID J. BLACK, Plaintiff, represented by Joel S. Sansone, Law Offices of Joel Sansone.

DAVID J. BLACK, Plaintiff, represented by Massimo A. Terzigni, Law Offices of Joel Sansone.

RICHARD WORKMAN, Defendant, represented by Scott A. Bradley, Office of the Attorney General.

ROBERT JONES, Defendant, represented by Scott A. Bradley, Office of the Attorney General.

JOSEPH TREMPUS, Defendant, represented by Scott A. Bradley, Office of the Attorney General.

FRANK J. KAMALICH, Defendant, represented by Scott A. Bradley, Office of the Attorney General.

MEMORANDUM

The Supreme Court has long mandated corrections officers, like all public employees, cannot claim their public employers' disciplinary and termination processes against them violate procedural due process under a "class of one" theory. This principle rests upon the difference...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases