MANIGO v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.

Case No. 2:16-cv-06722-JFW-PLAx.

LOIS A. MANIGO, ORLANDO GUTIERREZ, PHILIP MARTINEZ, PATRICIA VALLADARES-GALLEGOS, SHANA GILMORE, and WARREN V. NICHOLS, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC. and TWC ADMINISTRATION LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

November 21, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Nature of Suit: 790 Labor: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lois A Manigo, Plaintiff, represented by George P. Moschopoulos , Law Office of George Moschopoulos APC.

Lois A Manigo, Plaintiff, represented by Rhonda H. Wills , Wills Law Firm PLLC, pro hac vice.

Orlando Gutierrez, Plaintiff, represented by George P. Moschopoulos , Law Office of George Moschopoulos APC & Rhonda H. Wills , Wills Law Firm PLLC, pro hac vice.

Philip Martinez, Plaintiff, represented by George P. Moschopoulos , Law Office of George Moschopoulos APC & Rhonda H. Wills , Wills Law Firm PLLC, pro hac vice.

Patricia Valladares-Gallegos, Plaintiff, represented by George P. Moschopoulos , Law Office of George Moschopoulos APC & Rhonda H. Wills , Wills Law Firm PLLC, pro hac vice.

Shana Gilmore, Plaintiff, represented by George P. Moschopoulos , Law Office of George Moschopoulos APC & Rhonda H. Wills , Wills Law Firm PLLC, pro hac vice.

Warren V Nichols, Plaintiff, represented by George P. Moschopoulos , Law Office of George Moschopoulos APC & Rhonda H. Wills , Wills Law Firm PLLC, pro hac vice.

Time Warner Cable Inc., Defendant, represented by Amy E. Beverlin , Kabat Chapman and Ozmer LLP, Joseph W. Ozmer, II , Kabat Chapman and Ozmer LLP, pro hac vice & Joseph Scott Carr , Kabat Chapman and Ozmer LLP.

TWC Administration LLC, Defendant, represented by Amy E. Beverlin , Kabat Chapman and Ozmer LLP, Joseph W. Ozmer, II , Kabat Chapman and Ozmer LLP, pro hac vice & Joseph Scott Carr , Kabat Chapman and Ozmer LLP.


DISCOVERY MATTER

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1.

A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases