1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SYNOPSYS, INC. v. ATOPTECH, INC.
 

SYNOPSYS, INC. v. ATOPTECH, INC.

Case No. 13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR).

SYNOPSYS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ATOPTECH, INC, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

November 15, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Cause: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Nature of Suit: 820 Copyright
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Synopsys, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Heather Nicole Fugitt , Jones Day.

Synopsys, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Joe Chuan-Che Liu , Jones Day, Patrick Thomas Michael , Jones Day, Robert Allan Mittelstaedt , Jones Day, David B. Cochran , Jones Day, pro hac vice, David Craig Kiernan , Jones Day, Joseph McGowan Sauer , JONES DAY, pro hac vice, Krista Sue Schwartz , pro hac vice, Nathaniel Peardon Garrett , Jones Day & Thomas William Ritchie , Jones Day, pro hac vice.

Atoptech, Inc, Defendant, represented by Paul Alexander , Arnold & Porter LLP, Daniel B. Asimow , Arnold & Porter LLP, Denise L. McKenzie , Attorney at Law, Emily Clare Hostage , Arnold and Porter LLP, Jedediah Phillips , Arnold & Porter LLP, Martin R. Glick , Arnold & Porter, Michael Scott Tonkinson , Philip William Marsh , Arnold & Porter LLP, Sean Michael Callagy , Arnold & Porter & Willow White Noonan , Arnold and Porter LLP.

Broadcom Corporation, Miscellaneous, represented by Amanda Tessar , Perkins Coie LLP, pro hac vice.

Atoptech, Inc, Counter-claimant, represented by Paul Alexander , Arnold & Porter LLP, Daniel B. Asimow , Arnold & Porter LLP, Denise L. McKenzie , Attorney at Law, Emily Clare Hostage , Arnold and Porter LLP, Martin R. Glick , Arnold & Porter, Michael Scott Tonkinson , Philip William Marsh , Arnold & Porter LLP & Willow White Noonan , Arnold and Porter LLP.

Synopsys, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by Heather Nicole Fugitt , Jones Day, Joe Chuan-Che Liu , Jones Day, Patrick Thomas Michael , Jones Day, Robert Allan Mittelstaedt , Jones Day, David Craig Kiernan , Jones Day, Krista Sue Schwartz & Nathaniel Peardon Garrett , Jones Day.

ORDER ON JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER RE REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS

Re: Dkt. No. 809

Defendant ATopTech, Inc. seeks an order deeming Requests for Admissions ("RFA") Nos. 4, 13-15, 17-19, and 26-325 admitted, or in the alternative, an order compelling Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. to admit or deny them. Synopsys...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases