1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MAXCREST LIMITED v. U.S.
 

MAXCREST LIMITED v. U.S.

Case No. 15-mc-80270-JST.

MAXCREST LIMITED, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

November 7, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maxcrest Limited, Petitioner, represented by George Dominic Niespolo, Duane Morris LLP.

Maxcrest Limited, Petitioner, represented by Brendan Paul Ruddy, Duane Morris LLP & Thomas W. Ostrander, Duane Morris LLP.

United States of America, Respondent, represented by Amy Talburt Matchison, Department of Justice.

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER MAXCREST LIMITED'S MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL

Re: ECF No. 52

Before the Court is Petitioner Maxcrest Limited's Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. ECF No. 52. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants the motion.

I. BACKGROUND

This case began with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases