1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CARGOTEC CRANE AND ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. v. NORTHCLIFFE OCEAN SHIPPING & TRADING CO., INC.
 

CARGOTEC CRANE AND ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. v. NORTHCLIFFE OCEAN SHIPPING & TRADING CO., INC.

Case No. 3:16-cv-361-J-34MCR.

CARGOTEC CRANE AND ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. NORTHCLIFFE OCEAN SHIPPING & TRADING CO., INC., in personam; the Motor Tug RIO BRAVO, her engines, tackle, furnishings, etc. and the Barge BIG MAX, in rem, Defendants. NORTHCLIFFE OCEAN SHIPPING & TRADING CO., INC., Third Party Plaintiff, v. KALMAR GLOBAL, INC., Third Party Defendant. The Motor Tug RIO BRAVO, her engines, tackle, furnishings, etc. and the Barge BIG MAX, in rem, Cross-Plaintiffs, v. NORTHCLIFFE OCEAN SHIPPING & TRADING CO., INC., Cross-Defendant.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division, Admiralty.

November 1, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Nature of Suit: 120 Contract: Marine
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cargotec Crane and Electrical Services, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by G.J. Rod Sullivan, Jr. , Sullivan & Company.

The Motor Tug Rio Bravo, Defendant, represented by Michelle Otero Valdes , Chalos & CO., P.C..

The Barge Big Max, Defendant, represented by Michelle Otero Valdes , Chalos & CO., P.C..

Northcliffe Ocean Shipping & Trading Co., Inc., Defendant, represented by Michael W. McLeod , Rumrell, McLeod & Brock, PLLC & S. Scott Bluestein , Bluestein Law Firm, P.A., pro hac vice.

Northcliffe Ocean Shipping & Trading Co., Inc., Third Party Plaintiff, represented by Michael W. McLeod , Rumrell, McLeod & Brock, PLLC & S. Scott Bluestein , Bluestein Law Firm, P.A..

The Motor Tug Rio Bravo, Cross Claimant, represented by Michelle Otero Valdes , Chalos & CO., P.C..

The Barge Big Max, Cross Claimant, represented by Michelle Otero Valdes , Chalos & CO., P.C..

Northcliffe Ocean Shipping & Trading Co., Inc., Cross Defendant, represented by Michael W. McLeod , Rumrell, McLeod & Brock, PLLC & S. Scott Bluestein , Bluestein Law Firm, P.A..

ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Claimant Mobro Marine, Inc.'s1 Motion for Order for Plaintiff to Show Cause Why Arrest Should Not Be Vacated ("Mobro's Motion for Order to Show Cause") (Doc. 44), Plaintiff's Objection thereto and Motion to Deny Without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases