1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CG TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. FanDUEL, INC.
 

CG TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. FanDUEL, INC.

No. 2:16-cv-00801-RCJ-VCF.

CG TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al., Plaintiffs, v. FANDUEL, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

October 18, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

CG Technology Development, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Anthony D. Del Monaco , Finnegan, pro hac vice.

CG Technology Development, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Erica J. Chee , Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C., James R. Barney , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garett & Dunner, LLP, pro hac vice, Robert F. Shaffer , Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP, pro hac vice & Molly Malone Rezac , Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak, & Stewart, P.C..

Interactive Games Limited, Plaintiff, represented by Anthony D. Del Monaco , Finnegan, pro hac vice, Erica J. Chee , Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C., James R. Barney , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garett & Dunner, LLP, pro hac vice, Robert F. Shaffer , Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP, pro hac vice & Molly Malone Rezac , Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak, & Stewart, P.C..

Interactive Games LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Anthony D. Del Monaco , Finnegan, pro hac vice, Erica J. Chee , Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C., James R. Barney , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garett & Dunner, LLP, pro hac vice, Robert F. Shaffer , Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP, pro hac vice & Molly Malone Rezac , Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak, & Stewart, P.C..

FanDuel, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eric A. Buresh , Erise IP, P.A., pro hac vice, Caroline Bader , ERISE IP, P.A., pro hac vice, Clifford T. Brazil , ERISE IP, P.A., pro hac vice, Megan Redmond , Erise IP, P.A., pro hac vice & W. West Allen , Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC.

ORDER

This case arises out of the alleged infringement of several patents relating to automated gambling. Defendant has filed motions to dismiss, to stay, and to sever.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiffs CG Technology Development, Inc. ("CG Tech"), Interactive Games Limited ("IG...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases