1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HANNA v. FRESNO COUNTY
 

HANNA v. FRESNO COUNTY

Case No. 1:14-cv-00142 LJO/SKO.

DOMINIC HANNA, Plaintiff, v. FRESNO COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

October 11, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dominic Hanna, Plaintiff, represented by Carolyn D. Phillips , Carolyn Phillips Attorney at Law.

Dominic Hanna, Plaintiff, represented by Robert Navarro , Attorney at Law.

County of Fresno, Defendant, represented by Bruce Bradford Johnson, Jr. , Fresno County Counsel, Carey Hugh Johnson , Stammer, McKnight, Barnum & Bailey LLP & Michelle Pepper , Stammer McKnight Barnum & Bailey.

Magaret Mims, Defendant, represented by Carey Hugh Johnson , Stammer, McKnight, Barnum & Bailey LLP & Michelle Pepper , Stammer McKnight Barnum & Bailey.

Edward Moreno, M.D., Defendant, represented by Carey Hugh Johnson , Stammer, McKnight, Barnum & Bailey LLP & Michelle Pepper , Stammer McKnight Barnum & Bailey.

Pratap Narayen, M.D., Defendant, represented by Carey Hugh Johnson , Stammer, McKnight, Barnum & Bailey LLP & Michelle Pepper , Stammer McKnight Barnum & Bailey.

Karen Nunez, Defendant, represented by Carey Hugh Johnson , Stammer, McKnight, Barnum & Bailey LLP & Michelle Pepper , Stammer McKnight Barnum & Bailey.

Rick Hill, Defendant, represented by Carey Hugh Johnson , Stammer, McKnight, Barnum & Bailey LLP & Michelle Pepper , Stammer McKnight Barnum & Bailey.

Marilynn Weldon, Defendant, represented by Carey Hugh Johnson , Stammer, McKnight, Barnum & Bailey LLP & Michelle Pepper , Stammer McKnight Barnum & Bailey.

Tricia Nekola, Defendant, represented by Carey Hugh Johnson , Stammer, McKnight, Barnum & Bailey LLP & Michelle Pepper , Stammer McKnight Barnum & Bailey.

Thayin Vu, Defendant, represented by Carey Hugh Johnson , Stammer, McKnight, Barnum & Bailey LLP & Michelle Pepper , Stammer McKnight Barnum & Bailey.

STIPULATION FOR MODIFICATION OF DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DEADLINE AND HEARING DATE; ORDER

On October 7, 2016 the parties participated in good faith settlement discussions with Judge Seng. The discussions while fruitful were hampered by the absence of the authorization of a settlement amount by the Board of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases