JACKSON v. EGIRA, LLC

Civil Action No. RDB-14-3114.

SEAN JACKSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EGIRA, LLC, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

October 5, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Nature of Suit: 710 Labor: Fair Standards
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sean Jackson, Plaintiff, represented by Bradford W Warbasse , Bradford Warbasse Attorney at Law.

Sean Jackson, Plaintiff, represented by Howard Benjamin Hoffman , Howard B Hoffman Attorney at Law.

Craig A. Koehler, Jr., Plaintiff, represented by Bradford W Warbasse , Bradford Warbasse Attorney at Law & Howard Benjamin Hoffman , Howard B Hoffman Attorney at Law.

Russell P. Jackson, Plaintiff, represented by Bradford W Warbasse , Bradford Warbasse Attorney at Law & Howard Benjamin Hoffman , Howard B Hoffman Attorney at Law.

Emily Wisniewski, Plaintiff, represented by Bradford W Warbasse , Bradford Warbasse Attorney at Law & Howard Benjamin Hoffman , Howard B Hoffman Attorney at Law.

Jeremy Hewitt, Plaintiff, represented by Bradford W Warbasse , Bradford Warbasse Attorney at Law & Howard Benjamin Hoffman , Howard B Hoffman Attorney at Law.

Casey Ann Diven, Plaintiff, represented by Bradford W Warbasse , Bradford Warbasse Attorney at Law & Howard Benjamin Hoffman , Howard B Hoffman Attorney at Law.

Dawn Dorsey, Plaintiff, represented by Bradford W Warbasse , Bradford Warbasse Attorney at Law & Howard Benjamin Hoffman , Howard B Hoffman Attorney at Law.

Egira, LLC, Defendant, represented by Bruce M Luchansky , Luchansky Law & Samuel C. Pinsky , Luchansky Law.

Anastasia Vasilakopoulos, Defendant, represented by Bruce M Luchansky , Luchansky Law & Samuel C. Pinsky , Luchansky Law.

Konstantinos Vasilakopoulos, Defendant, represented by Bruce M Luchansky , Luchansky Law & Samuel C. Pinsky , Luchansky Law.

Vasilios Vasilakopoulos, Defendant, represented by Bruce M Luchansky , Luchansky Law & Samuel C. Pinsky , Luchansky Law.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Currently pending is Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (ECF No. 142).1 The parties' submissions have been reviewed, and no hearing is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2016). For the reasons that follow...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases