1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 222 F.Supp.3d
  5. 222 F.Supp.3d 222 (2016)
 

COCONUT GROVE PADS, INC. v. MICH & MICH TGR, INC.

15-CV-2158 (KAM)(GRB).

222 F.Supp.3d 222 (2016)

COCONUT GROVE PADS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MICH & MICH TGR, INC., Michelle Ostaseski, and Michael Hayes, Defendants. Mich & Mich TGR, Inc. and Michelle Ostaseski, Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. Coconut Grove Pads, Inc., Counterclaim Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

Signed September 30, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Stuart Ross, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendants.

Gerard F. Dunne, Joseph A. Dunne, Joseph Anthony Dunne, Law Office of Gerard F. Dunne, P.C., New York, NY, for Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Coconut Grove Pads, Inc. ("CGP") commenced this action principally seeking a declaratory judgment that U.S. Reissue Patent No. 43,766 (the "'766 Patent" or the "patent-in-suit") is invalid and not infringed by CGP. The patent-in-suit is for a bra strap...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases