1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.P. v. COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING
 

A.P. v. COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING

Case No. 2:13-cv-01588-JAM-AC.

A.P. (a minor); ROBIN MAMMEN and LARRY MAMMEN individually and as Guardian ad Litem for A.P., Plaintiffs, v. COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, STEPHANIE LYNCH, LUIS VILLA; MICHELLE CALLEJAS, DEBRA WILLIAMS, CRAIG LARKIN, RENAE RODOCKER, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division.

September 21, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robin Mammen, Plaintiff, represented by Jay T. Jambeck , Leigh Law Group.

Robin Mammen, Plaintiff, represented by Mandy G. Leigh , Leigh Law Group.

Larry Mammen, Plaintiff, represented by Jay T. Jambeck , Leigh Law Group & Mandy G. Leigh , Leigh Law Group.

A. P., Plaintiff, represented by Mandy G. Leigh , Leigh Law Group & Jay T. Jambeck , Leigh Law Group.

County of Sacramento, Defendant, represented by Amanda Lynn McDermott , Longyear O'Dea and Lavra & John A. Lavra , Longyear, Odea & Lavra, LLP.

Renae Rodocker, Defendant, represented by Amanda Lynn McDermott , Longyear O'Dea and Lavra & John A. Lavra , Longyear, Odea & Lavra, LLP.

Luis Villa, Defendant, represented by Amanda Lynn McDermott , Longyear O'Dea and Lavra & John A. Lavra , Longyear, Odea & Lavra, LLP.

Debbie Williams, Defendant, represented by Amanda Lynn McDermott , Longyear O'Dea and Lavra & John A. Lavra , Longyear, Odea & Lavra, LLP.

Stephanie Lynch, Defendant, represented by Amanda Lynn McDermott , Longyear O'Dea and Lavra & John A. Lavra , Longyear, Odea & Lavra, LLP.

Michelle Callejas, Defendant, represented by Amanda Lynn McDermott , Longyear O'Dea and Lavra & John A. Lavra , Longyear, Odea & Lavra, LLP.

Craig Larken, Defendant, represented by Amanda Lynn McDermott , Longyear O'Dea and Lavra & John A. Lavra , Longyear, Odea & Lavra, LLP.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER TO ALLOW FOR PHASED DISCOVERY

COMES NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective counsel and subject to the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that this Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order dated July 12, 2016 [ECF...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases