1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. LUFTHANSA TECHNIK AG v. ASTRONICS ADVANCED ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS CORP.
 

LUFTHANSA TECHNIK AG v. ASTRONICS ADVANCED ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS CORP.

No. C14-1821 RSM.

Lufthansa Technik AG, Plaintiff, v. Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corp. and KID-Systeme GmbH, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington.

August 18, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lufthansa Technik AG, Plaintiff, represented by Bradley S. Keller , BYRNES KELLER CROMWELL LLP, David M. Maiorana , JONES DAY, pro hac vice, Keith David Petrak , BYRNES KELLER CROMWELL LLP, Lawrence D. Rosenberg , JONES DAY, pro hac vice & Susan M. Gerber , JONES DAY, pro hac vice.

KID-Systeme GmbH, Defendant, represented by Louis David Peterson , HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON, Mark A. Chapman , KENYON & KENYON LLP, pro hac vice, Walter E. Hanley, Jr. , KENYON & KENYON LLP, pro hac vice & Michael Ramsey Scott , HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON.

Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corp., Counter Claimant, represented by Benjamin M. Daniels , WIGGIN AND DANA, James H. Bicks , WIGGIN & DANA, Joseph M. Casino , WIGGIN AND DANA & Stuart R. Dunwoody , DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE.

Lufthansa Technik AG, Counter Defendant, represented by Bradley S. Keller , BYRNES KELLER CROMWELL LLP, David M. Maiorana , JONES DAY, Keith David Petrak , BYRNES KELLER CROMWELL LLP, Lawrence D. Rosenberg , JONES DAY & Susan M. Gerber , JONES DAY.

Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corp., Counter Claimant, represented by Benjamin M. Daniels , WIGGIN AND DANA, James H. Bicks , WIGGIN & DANA, John Doroghazi , WIGGIN AND DANA LLP, Joseph M. Casino , WIGGIN AND DANA & Stuart R. Dunwoody , DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE.

Lufthansa Technik AG, Counter Defendant, represented by Bradley S. Keller , BYRNES KELLER CROMWELL LLP, David M. Maiorana , JONES DAY, Keith David Petrak , BYRNES KELLER CROMWELL LLP, Lawrence D. Rosenberg , JONES DAY & Susan M. Gerber , JONES DAY.

STIPULATION, MOTION, AND ORDER REGARDING STAY AND REQUEST FOR FINAL JUDGMENT

STIPULATION AND MOTION

The parties, by their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:

1. On July 20, 2016, the Court issued its Summary Judgment Order (Dkt. No. 148), granting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases