JOHNSTON v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case No. 3:16-cv-3134-EMC, [Related to Case No. 3:13-cv-3826-EMC].

TODD JOHNSTON, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. Related to: O'Connor et al. v. Uber Tech., Inc., No. 3:13-cv-3826-EMC.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

August 29, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd Johnston, Plaintiff, represented by Thomas J. Brandi , The Brandi Law Firm, Brian J. Malloy , The Brandi Law Firm, John Randolph Davis , Slack and Davis, LLP, pro hac vice & Michael L. Slack , Slack and Davis, LLP, pro hac vice.

Uber Technologies, Inc., Defendant, represented by Carlos Jimenez , Littler Mendelson, Emily Erin O'Connor , Littler Mendelson, P.C. & Keith Adam Jacoby , Littler Mendelson.


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

STIPULATION

1. WHEREAS, an initial case management conference was originally set for September 29, 2016;

2. WHEREAS, Defendant Uber Technologies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases