1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF SOPKA
 

IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF SOPKA

Case No. 15 C 3230.

In the Matter of the Complaint of Tamara Sopka, Independent Administrator of the Estate of Orest Sopka, Deceased, and Axess Holding Company, LLC as Owners of a 2012 Rinker 310 Express motor vessel "AXESS", for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

August 9, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tamara Sopka, Plaintiff, represented by James E. Mercante , Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman Llp, pro hac vice & Anthony Raymond Rutkowski , Rutkowski Law Group P.C..

Axess Holding Company LLC, Plaintiff, represented by James E. Mercante , Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman Llp, pro hac vice & Anthony Raymond Rutkowski , Rutkowski Law Group P.C..

Skyway Yacht Works LLC, Claimant, represented by Dennis Minichello , Marwedel, Minichello & Reeb, P.C. & Michael David Reed , Marwedel, Minichello & Reeb, P.c..

Sharon Haws, Claimant, represented by Timothy Joseph Mahoney , Attorney at Law, David F. Rolewick , Rolewick & Gutzke, P.C. & Hilary E. Wild , Rolewick & Gutzke, P.C..

Creative Yacht Management, Inc. d/b/a SailTime Chicago, Claimant, represented by Patrick A. Fleming , Novack & Macey LLP, Joshua Edward Liebman , Novack and Macey, LLP & Yvette V. Mishev , Novack and Macey LLP.

Peggy M. Blenner, Claimant, represented by Kevin P. Durkin , Clifford Law Offices, P.C., Sean Patrick Driscoll , Clifford Law Offices & Tracy A. Brammeier , Clifford Law Offices, P.C..

Shai Wolkowicki, Claimant, represented by Kenneth A. Hoffman , Mitchell, Hoffman & Wolf, LLC.

Markel American Insurance Company, Intervenor, represented by Christopher Alan Abel , Willcox & Savage, P.C., pro hac vice, James Michael Eastham , Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry, Jason Michael Taylor , Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry, Llp & Mark F. Wolfe , Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Markel American Insurance Company ("Markel") has motioned to intervene in this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. ("Rule") 24(b). For the several reasons articulated in this opinion, Markel's petition must be and is denied.1<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases