1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ACOSTA v. SHANLEY CORP.
 

ACOSTA v. SHANLEY CORP.

Case No. 16-cv-00971-RMW.

FATIMA ACOSTA, Plaintiff, v. SHANLEY CORP., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

July 27, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fatima Acosta, Plaintiff, represented by L. Timothy Fisher , Bursor & Fisher P.A., Scott A. Bursor , Bursor & Fisher, P.A., pro hac vice, Yeremey O. Krivoshey , Bursor Fisher, P.A. & Annick Marie Persinger , Bursor & Fisher, P.A..

Shanley Corp., Defendant, represented by Kellie Jo Mitchell , Copilevitz and Canter, pro hac vice, William Edward Raney , Copilevitz & Center, LLC, pro hac vice & Bruce Harry Winkelman , Attorney at Law.

TTC-Ameridial, LLC, Defendant, represented by Kellie Jo Mitchell , Copilevitz and Canter, William Edward Raney , Copilevitz & Center, LLC, Bruce Harry Winkelman , Attorney at Law & William E. Raney , Copilevitz & Canter, LLC.

ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT ENE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request to excuse plaintiff Fatima Acosta from appearing in person at the August 4, 2016, ENE before Stephen Pahl is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases