ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY v. VILLAGE OF OAK LAWN

No. 14-cv-4572.

ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF OAK LAWN, TODD TENISON, and SCOTT KIRK, Defendants. VILLAGE OF OAK LAWN, TODD TENISON, and SCOTT KIRK, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. CANNON COCHRAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., Third-Party Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

July 27, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Essex Insurance Company, Plaintiff, represented by Amanda Michelle Buishas, Johnson & Bell, Ltd., Jennifer Marie Theodore, Johnson and Bell Ltd. & William K. McVisk, Johnson & Bell, Ltd..

Village of Oak Lawn, Defendant, represented by Christopher S. Naveja, Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Hal R. Morris, Arnstein & Lehr LLP & Arthur L. Janura, Jr., Arnstein & Lehr LLP.

Todd Tenison, Defendant, represented by Christopher S. Naveja, Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Hal R. Morris, Arnstein & Lehr LLP & Arthur L. Janura, Jr., Arnstein & Lehr LLP.

Scott Kirk, Defendant, represented by Christopher S. Naveja, Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Hal R. Morris, Arnstein & Lehr LLP & Arthur L. Janura, Jr., Arnstein & Lehr LLP.

Scott Kirk, ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Christopher S. Naveja, Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Hal R. Morris, Arnstein & Lehr LLP & Arthur L. Janura, Jr., Arnstein & Lehr LLP.

Todd Tenison, ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Christopher S. Naveja, Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Hal R. Morris, Arnstein & Lehr LLP & Arthur L. Janura, Jr., Arnstein & Lehr LLP.

Village of Oak Lawn, ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Christopher S. Naveja, Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Hal R. Morris, Arnstein & Lehr LLP & Arthur L. Janura, Jr., Arnstein & Lehr LLP.

Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc., Third Party Defendant, represented by Rachael G. Winthrop, SmithAmundsen LLC, Victor J. Piekarski, SmithAmundsen, L.L.C. & Clay H. Phillips, SmithAmundsen LLC.

Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Victor J. Piekarski, SmithAmundsen, L.L.C..

Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Victor J. Piekarski, SmithAmundsen, L.L.C..


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a) with respect to Counts VIII and IX of the Second Amended Complaint. (R.90). Specifically, Defendant Oak Lawn seeks a declaration that two provisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases