1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GRELLNER v. RAABE
 

GRELLNER v. RAABE

No. 2:15-CV-0189-SMJ.

DANIEL GRELLNER, individually and doing bussiness as Venacore, Inc., Plaintiff, v. RODNEY D. RAABE, SAPHEON INC., SAPHEON LLC, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN SALES LLC, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Washington.

July 15, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Grellner, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew G. Pate , Nix Patterson & Roach LLP, pro hac vice, Chad Ethan Ihrig , Nix Patterson & Roach LLP, pro hac vice, John Ray Nelson , Foster Pepper PLLC, Michael Angelovich , Nix Patterson & Roach LLP, pro hac vice, Michael Burrage , Whitten Burrage, pro hac vice, Richard J. Grellner , RJG Law PLLC, pro hac vice & Richard Benjamin King , Nix Patterson & Roach LLP, pro hac vice.

Rodney D Raabe, Defendant, represented by Andrea L. Gothing , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Andrew D. Hedden , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Roman M. Silberfeld , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice & Geana Van Dessel , Lee & Hayes PLLC.

Sapheon Inc, Defendant, represented by Andrea L. Gothing , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Andrew D. Hedden , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Roman M. Silberfeld , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice & Geana Van Dessel , Lee & Hayes PLLC.

Sapheon LLC, Defendant, represented by Andrea L. Gothing , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Andrew D. Hedden , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Roman M. Silberfeld , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice & Geana Van Dessel , Lee & Hayes PLLC.

Covidien Holding Inc, Defendant, represented by Andrea L. Gothing , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Andrew D. Hedden , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Roman M. Silberfeld , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice & Geana Van Dessel , Lee & Hayes PLLC.

Covidien LP, Defendant, represented by Andrea L. Gothing , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Andrew D. Hedden , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Roman M. Silberfeld , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice & Geana Van Dessel , Lee & Hayes PLLC.

Covidien Sales LLC, Defendant, represented by Andrea L. Gothing , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Andrew D. Hedden , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Roman M. Silberfeld , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice & Geana Van Dessel , Lee & Hayes PLLC.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

Before the Court, with oral argument, is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 52. Having reviewed the pleadings and the file in this matter, the Court is fully informed and denies Defendant's motion.

I. Factual Background

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases