1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. JOHNSON v. TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCE/NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP
 

JOHNSON v. TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCE/NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP

No. 3:15-cv-01727-CMC.

Stanley Johnson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership d/b/a/Time Warner Cable, and Time Warner Cable Southeast LLC d/b/a Time Warner Cable, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division.

July 5, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley Johnson, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher P. Kenney, Richard A. Harpootlian Law Office, Richard A. Harpootlian, Richard A. Harpootlian Law Office & Tobias Gavin Ward, Jr., Tobias G Ward Jr Law Firm.

Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership, Defendant, represented by Frank Rogers Ellerbe, III, Robinson McFadden and Moore & Kevin Kendrick Bell, Robinson McFadden and Moore.

Time Warner Cable Southeast LLC, Defendant, represented by Frank Rogers Ellerbe, III, Robinson McFadden and Moore & Kevin Kendrick Bell, Robinson McFadden and Moore.

Opinion and Order Denying Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 109).

This matter is before the court on Defendants' Third Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 109). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.1

BACKGROUND

As explained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases