1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DOE v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 

DOE v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case No. 3:15-cv-04670-SI.

JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

June 29, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jane DOE 1, Plaintiff, represented by Douglas H. Wigdor , Wigdor LLP, Jeanne M. Christensen , Wigdor LLP, Elizabeth J. Chen , Wigdor LLP, Tanvir Haque Rahman , Wigdor LLP & Jamie Cameron Couche , Anderson and Poole, P.C..

Jane Doe 2, Plaintiff, represented by Douglas H. Wigdor , Wigdor LLP, Jeanne M. Christensen , Wigdor LLP, Elizabeth J. Chen , Wigdor LLP, Tanvir Haque Rahman , Wigdor LLP & Jamie Cameron Couche , Anderson and Poole, P.C..

Uber Technologies, Inc., Defendant, represented by Josh Alan Cohen , Clarence Dyer & Cohen LLP.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the July 8, 2016 conference is adjourned to July 22, 2016.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' lead trial counsel be permitted to appear telephonically for the conference.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases