1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PAPST LICENSING GmbH & CO. KG v. HP INC.
 

PAPST LICENSING GmbH & CO. KG v. HP INC.

Case No. 16-cv-00575-JD.

PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG, Plaintiff, v. HP INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

June 23, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, Plaintiff, represented by Brian E. Farnan , Phillips, Goldman & Spence, P.A., Andrew Grant Hamill , Black & Hamill LLP, Bradford John Black , Black & Hamill LLP, Eric J. Stieglitz , Desmarais LLP, pro hac vice, John M. Desmarais , Desmarais LLP, pro hac vice, Jonas R. McDavit , Desmarais LLP, pro hac vice, Michael J. Farnan , Farnan LLP, Richard M. Cowell , Desmarais LLP, pro hac vice & Richard Matthew Cowell , Desmarais LLP.

HP Inc., Defendant, represented by Bryan A. Kohm , Fenwick & West LLP, pro hac vice, Charlene M. Morrow , Fenwick & West LLP, pro hac vice, William J. Wade , Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Hector Ribera , Fenwick & West LLP, pro hac vice, Travis Steven Hunter , Richards, Layton & Finger, PA & Charlene Marie Morrow , Fenwick & West LLP.

HP Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by William J. Wade , Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Bryan A. Kohm , Fenwick & West LLP, Charlene M. Morrow , Fenwick & West LLP, Travis Steven Hunter , Richards, Layton & Finger, PA & Charlene Marie Morrow , Fenwick & West LLP.

Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, Counter-defendant, represented by Brian E. Farnan , Phillips, Goldman & Spence, P.A., Eric J. Stieglitz , Desmarais LLP, John M. Desmarais , Desmarais LLP, Jonas R. McDavit , Desmarais LLP, Michael J. Farnan , Farnan LLP & Richard M. Cowell , Desmarais LLP.

HP Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by Charlene Marie Morrow , Fenwick & West LLP.

Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, Counter-defendant, represented by Brian E. Farnan , Phillips, Goldman & Spence, P.A., Andrew Grant Hamill , Black & Hamill LLP, Bradford John Black , Black & Hamill LLP, Eric J. Stieglitz , Desmarais LLP, John M. Desmarais , Desmarais LLP, Jonas R. McDavit , Desmarais LLP, Michael J. Farnan , Farnan LLP, Richard M. Cowell , Desmarais LLP & Richard Matthew Cowell , Desmarais LLP.

ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE

The Court is advised that the parties have settled. Dkt. No. 70. Consequently, the Court vacates all pretrial deadlines and dismisses this case without prejudice. If any party certifies to the Court within 30 days from the date of this order that the agreed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases