EASLEY v. CITY OF RIVERSIDE

No. CV 14-00117 TJH (SPx).

MICHAEL EASLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division.

June 3, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Easley, Plaintiff, represented by Adam Feit , Mardirossian and Associates Inc., Dale K Galipo , Law Offices of Dale Galipo, Garo Mardirossian , Mardirossian and Associates Inc APLC & Lawrence D Marks , Mardirossian and Associates Inc.

Stephania Session, Plaintiff, represented by Adam Feit , Mardirossian and Associates Inc., Dale K Galipo , Law Offices of Dale Galipo & Garo Mardirossian , Mardirossian and Associates Inc APLC.

City of Riverside, Defendant, represented by Arthur Kenneth Cunningham , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP, James C Packer , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP, John M Porter , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP, Neil Okazaki , Office of the City Attorney, Timothy Towery Coates , Greines Martin Stein and Richland LLP, Alana H Rotter , Greines Martin Stein and Richland LLP & Alison McIlvaine Turner , Greines Martin Stein & Richland.

Sergio Diaz, Defendant, represented by Arthur Kenneth Cunningham , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP, James C Packer , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP, John M Porter , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP, Neil Okazaki , Office of the City Attorney, Timothy Towery Coates , Greines Martin Stein and Richland LLP, Alana H Rotter , Greines Martin Stein and Richland LLP & Alison McIlvaine Turner , Greines Martin Stein & Richland.

Silvio Macias, Defendant, represented by Arthur Kenneth Cunningham , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP, James C Packer , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP, John M Porter , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP, Neil Okazaki , Office of the City Attorney, Timothy Towery Coates , Greines Martin Stein and Richland LLP, Alana H Rotter , Greines Martin Stein and Richland LLP & Alison McIlvaine Turner , Greines Martin Stein & Richland.


Amended Order and Judgment

The Court, having ordered and conducted an evidentiary hearing on the issue of qualified immunity, has considered the evidence introduced by the parties and the briefs filed in lieu of closing arguments, now, issues the following Order:

Qualified immunity must be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases