IN RE AUTOZONE, INC., WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION

Case No. 10-md-02159-CRB (JSC).

In re: AUTOZONE, INC., WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

May 16, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jimmy Ellison, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Joseph Sokolowski , Capstone Law APC, Bevin Elaine Allen Pike , Capstone Law APC, Robert Joseph Drexler, Jr. , Capstone Law APC, Jonathan Sing Lee , Capstone Law APC, Katherine Ward Kehr , Capstone Law APC, Marc Primo , Initiative Legal Group APC, Mark R. Thierman , Thierman Buck, LLP ., Matthew Thomas Theriault , Capstone Law APC, Monica Balderrama , Initiative Legal Group APC, Raul Perez , Capstone Law APC, Rebecca Labat , Capstone Law APC, Robert Kenneth Friedl , Capstone Law APC & Stan Karas , Capstone Law APC.

Silvia Escobar, Plaintiff, represented by Aldon Louis Bolanos , Bolanos Firm & Mark R. Thierman , Thierman Buck, LLP ..

Haydee Escalante, Plaintiff, represented by Gregg Lander , Law Offices of Kevin T. Barnes, Kevin Todd Barnes , Law Offices of Kevin T. Barnes, Giuseppe Joseph Antonelli , Law Office of Joseph Antonelli & Janelle Christine Carney , Law Office of Joseph Antonelli.

Lynnetta Ellison, Plaintiff, represented by Morris Nazarian , Law Offices of Morris Nazarian.

Mark Sanchez, Plaintiff, represented by Mark Yablonovich , Law Offices of Mark Yablonovich, Joseph Steven Hoff , Law Offices of Mark Yablonovich & Patrick Joseph Clifford , Selman Breitman, LLP.

Drake Price, Plaintiff, represented by Alan Harris , Harris and Ruble, Christina Marie Nordsten , Harris and Ruble, David Covington Garrett , Harris and Ruble & Priya Mohan , Harris and Ruble.

AutoZone, Inc, Defendant, represented by Michael E. Brewer , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Alison Jacquelyn Cubre , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Amy C. Hirsh , Arena Hoffman LLP, Gregory G. Iskander , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Jeffrey J. Mann , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Michael A. Hoffman, III , Arena Hoffman LLP & Ronald D. Arena , Arena Hoffman LLP.


ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Re: Dkt. No. 258

This matter has been referred to the undersigned magistrate judge for the purposes of discovery. (Dkt. No. 42.)1 Presently before the Court is a joint discovery letter concerning Defendant's request for an order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases