1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. QUEEN v. SCHMIDT
 

QUEEN v. SCHMIDT

Civil Action No. 10-2017 (PLF).

KATRINA QUEEN, KITT HASTON, and WILLIAM QUEEN, Plaintiffs, v. JANET SCHMIDT, MARK CERA, and BONNIE MILLER, Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

May 12, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

KATRINA QUEEN, Plaintiff, represented by Robert Phillip Bunn , LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT BUNN.

KITT HASTON, Plaintiff, represented by Robert Phillip Bunn , LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT BUNN.

WILLIAM QUEEN, Plaintiff, represented by Robert Phillip Bunn , LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT BUNN.

JANET SCHMIDT, Defendant, Pro Se.

MARK CERA, Defendant, Pro Se.

BONNIE MILLER, Defendant, Pro Se.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs Katrina Queen and William Queen's motion to dismiss this case under the doctrine of abstention. See Dkt. 85 (Apr. 8, 2016). Defendant Janet Schmidt filed an untimely opposition to the motion, see

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases