1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. AVM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. INTEL CORPORATION
 

AVM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. INTEL CORPORATION

C. A. No. 15-33-RGA/MPT.

AVM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

May 3, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

AVM Technologies LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Nicholas D. Mozal , Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Benjamin J. Schladweiler , Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, David Boies , pro hac vice, David Michael Underhill , pro hac vice, Edward H. Takashima , pro hac vice, Eric J. Maurer , pro hac vice, Jon R. Knight , pro hac vice, Parker H. Bagley , pro hac vice, Patrick M. Lafferty , pro hac vice & Roseanne C. Baxter , pro hac vice.

Intel Corporation, Defendant, represented by Richard L. Horwitz , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Claire M. Specht , pro hac vice, David C. Marcus , pro hac vice, David Ellis Moore , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Jason Kipnis , pro hac vice, Kevin A. Goldman , pro hac vice, Nancy L. Schroeder , pro hac vice, Todd Zubler , pro hac vice, William F. Lee , pro hac vice & Bindu Ann George Palapura , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP.

Intel Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Bindu Ann George Palapura , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP.

AVM Technologies LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Benjamin J. Schladweiler , Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP.

Intel Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Richard L. Horwitz , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Claire M. Specht , David C. Marcus , David Ellis Moore , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Jason Kipnis , Kevin A. Goldman , Nancy L. Schroeder , Todd Zubler , William F. Lee & Bindu Ann George Palapura , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP.

AVM Technologies LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Benjamin J. Schladweiler , Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, David Boies , David Michael Underhill , Edward H. Takashima , Jon R. Knight , Parker H. Bagley , Patrick M. Lafferty & Roseanne C. Baxter .

Memorandum Order

A telephonic hearing was held on January 29, 2016 to address a number of discovery issues.1 During the hearing, the Court invited counsel to supplement their original submissions2 on the remaining issue addressed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases